IELTS Speaking cue cards › Competition
Describe a competition you took part in
Describe a competition you took part in. You should say: - what kind of competition it was and where it was held - how you prepared for it and who you competed against - what the outcome was and explain what you learned from taking part in that experience.
How to approach it
Open with the type and setting of the competition, then move through preparation and opponents before landing on the outcome and your personal takeaway. Examiners reward coherent narration, so use clear time markers to guide your story from start to finish. Save roughly 30 seconds at the end for the 'explain' prompt, as this is where higher-band reflective language earns the most credit.
1-minute preparation notes
- School debate competition – regional level
- Researched topic 2 weeks, practised with teacher
- Competed vs. older students from other schools
- Lost in semi-final but praised for clarity
- Learned: composure under pressure, how to argue fairly
Band 8+ sample answer (Part 2)
Show the sample answer (try speaking first)
I'd like to talk about a debating competition I took part in when I was about sixteen. It was a regional inter-school debate held at a large secondary school in my city, and honestly, at the time it felt like the biggest stage I'd ever been on.
In terms of preparation, I threw myself into it completely. I spent around two weeks researching the topic, which was about whether social media does more harm than good – quite a meaty subject for a teenager! My English teacher coached me after school, helping me structure arguments and, crucially, stay calm when someone challenges you mid-speech. We did mock rounds where she'd deliberately throw tricky questions at me just to build my confidence.
As for the competition itself, my team was up against students from five other schools, most of whom were a year or two older than us, so we were definitely the underdogs going in. We made it all the way to the semi-final, which already felt like punching above our weight, but we narrowly lost on points. The judges actually commended our team for the clarity of our arguments, which softened the blow considerably.
Looking back, I think what I learned goes far beyond debating skills. I realised that losing gracefully is genuinely hard but really important. I also discovered I could hold my nerve in a high-pressure situation, which I hadn't known about myself before. Most importantly, I learned that competing against stronger opponents pushes you to raise your own game. That lesson has stuck with me ever since and shaped how I approach challenges in general.
Written for StudyChat as an example of a band 8+ answer. 268 words, about 2 minutes spoken.
Part 3 discussion questions
How do you think competitive experiences in childhood affect a person's character as an adult?
I think they're hugely influential, to be honest. When children face competition, they learn to handle both success and failure, and those early lessons tend to stick. A child who loses a spelling bee but tries again develops resilience that serves them well later in life. However, the effect depends on how adults around them frame the experience – emphasising effort over outcome makes the difference between building confidence and creating anxiety.
Are there any types of competitions you feel place too much pressure on participants? Why?
Absolutely – I think elite youth sports can be particularly intense. Young athletes sometimes train at a professional level before they're emotionally ready, and the pressure from coaches, parents and scouts can be overwhelming. I've heard of teenage tennis and gymnastics prodigies who burned out completely before reaching adulthood. The problem is that the financial rewards for early talent push everyone to rush development, which often does more harm than good in the long run.
How do competitions in academic settings differ from those in sports or the arts?
The key difference, I'd say, is what's being judged. Academic competitions tend to reward a single correct answer or a measurable score, which makes outcomes feel more objective and final. Sports and arts competitions, on the other hand, often involve subjective judging and physical performance on the day, so luck and nerves play a bigger role. That said, both require serious dedication, and both can teach teamwork and discipline just as effectively as the other.
Do you think society places too much emphasis on winning rather than participation? Why or why not?
I do, to a degree. In many cultures, we celebrate first place and barely acknowledge anyone else, which sends a message that taking part without winning is somehow pointless. Some major sporting events include participation as a core value in their founding principles, yet we'd be hard-pressed to name a single silver medallist from the last big championship. That said, a healthy drive to win isn't inherently bad – the issue is when it completely overshadows the personal growth that competition naturally produces.
Useful language
- compete against stronger opponents – Use to describe facing more experienced rivals, shows range beyond simply 'play against'.
- the underdogs going in – Natural idiom for entering a competition as the less-fancied side.
- punching above our weight – Idiomatic way to say you performed better than expected given your level.
- throw yourself into preparation – Colocation meaning to prepare with full commitment and energy.
- hold your nerve – Describes staying calm under competitive pressure; very natural in spoken English.
- soften the blow – Use when describing how something made a loss or disappointment easier to accept.
- raise your game – Means to improve performance, often in response to facing tough competition.
- commend someone for something – Formal way to say judges or officials praised a specific quality; elevates vocabulary.
Common mistakes on this card
- Describing only the competition itself and forgetting the final 'explain what you learned' prompt, which is where examiners look for reflective, higher-band language.
- Using vague outcome language such as 'I did okay' or 'it went well' – always specify a concrete result, even if you lost, to give the answer substance and authenticity.
- Memorising a script that sounds unnatural; examiners penalise rehearsed-sounding delivery, so practise telling the story conversationally rather than reciting it word for word.
Record your answer and get a band score
Answer this card out loud, then the Part 3 questions. You get a band estimate on all four criteria, with pace, pauses and fillers measured from your recording.
Tap to start recording
Not ready to speak yet? from a real recording
2 free speaking checks a day. No sign-up. Your recording is deleted right after it is transcribed.
Uploading…